RE:RE:PP StatusDid Edgewater feel the need to hide the fact that they needed help to get investors for theitr PP? Are disingenuous and misleading games necessary to get attention? This PP was non-brokered, my ash. Something about paying cash for services may be a loophole they are hoping to get approval for, and of course using loopholes while advertising the opposite is such an ethical thing to do. Do you trust a person who tells you one thing to sound impressive, and then does the opposite? Considering what has been uncovered so far, I think other things are going on here and the betting money isn't for the project, but rather it's all about establishing perceptions and how to take advantage of people who believe them.
RoyallyScrewed wrote: The first offering was supposed to be non-brokered.
..."is pleased to announce that the first tranche of its non-brokered private placement announced on March 12, 2021 (the “ Offering ”) has closed. "
And yet...
"In connection with the closing of the first tranche of the Offering, the Company will pay cash finders’ fees in the aggregate of $33,563 as follows: $23,905 to Haywood Securities Inc. / $2,012 to Leede Jones Gable Inc. / $644 to Canaccord Genuity Corp. / $7,002 to Granger Cumberford. In addition, the Company will issue 291,854 Finders’ Warrants as follows: 207,869 to Haywood Securities Inc. / 17,500 to Leede Jones Gable Inc. / 5,600 to Canaccord Genuity Corp. / 60,885 to Granger Cumberford."