RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Simply 2.....simpliciti wrote: Fishtank101,
Over the last 7 plus years, this company has received "approvals" from a variety of agencies suggesting that the "technology" and more importantly, the "aims and objectives" of the technology have merit.
I ask you this: Who wouldn't approve a technology that claims to do what Payne et al claim this widget does?
In politics and government, people are always willing to jump on a bandwagon that the public supports. Climate change, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Credits........ they are all top of mind and very easy stories to get behind and to raise money from.
Do you think any one of those entities has done a single long term test on one of the widgets? If they had....... where are the publications that verify same? And please don't talk to me about Homologation and TUV...... .Been there, done that......
The truth is they are all meaningless........ SIMPLY because the widget doesn't work in the real world.
The problem is: While they may claim the product does certain things, the company has yet to provide a single, evidence-based example. Not one! WHY?
Because they can't get it to work! Do you really think that it took 18 months and three (3) tries for homologation simply because TUV couldn't believe the "phenomenal" results? Give your head a shake?
Not a single sale result in the EU since Homologation. Why is that?
Define Approval? If this thing did what it said it did....... where are the purchase orders from those very same governments and agencies?
Woodstock is a city government. Where is the order? Why haven't they published test results? Same for Toronto?
The list goes on and on and on.
Don't get me wrong...... there is probably some semblance of an opportunity here if it is placed in the proper hands......
As far as I am concerned, we are in official SCAM territoty now. There is no justification for the continued waste of investor dollars by a management team that puts their personal egos and finances ahead of their fiduciary responsibility to shareholders.
Payne et al have zero credibility in the one place where it is needed most...... the marketplace.....
Time for Payne, Hoffman, Colin and eventually Maier to go....
Well I am not buying what you are selling about the product. Financials I agree, this could go bankrupt before they have considerable sales. But I do believe the product works.