RE:RE:No Proven/Probable “Ore Reserve” Classification? Who are the "we" you are referring? Lets hope its not the proponent/applicant. That would be troubling.
My previous post identified +/-10% accuracy, not to within "10% accuracy". Significant difference. Yes, a PFS meeting legal requirements, in order to determine proven/probable reserve/ore identifying viable economic development, is needed.
The point being, after all of this effort and existing PFS information, including mine/mineral processing/ancillary facility design, they use supposed lawsuits and permitting completion to not release factual and compliant economic analysis per a PFS? Nonsense.
We all have our mining technical limitations, but if your mine engineering experience is limited to an operating mine economics (mine design), its scope is limited since the mine IS operating.
Stakeholders, including the State should be provided this information, or at leadt a statement of proven/probable classification.
If you have to default to name calling its obvious you cannot provide additional meaningful discussion.
Again, only the proponents compliant release or statement by PFS specifically identifying proven/probable economics matter.