Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canada Nickel Company Inc V.CNC

Alternate Symbol(s):  CNIKF

Canada Nickel Company Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in advancing the nickel-sulfide projects to deliver nickel required to feed the electric vehicle and stainless-steel markets. The Company owns flagship Crawford Nickel-Cobalt Sulphide Project in the heart of the prolific Timmins-Cochrane mining camp. The Company also owns 25 additional nickel targets located near the Crawford Project. Its wholly owned NetZero Metals Inc. to develop zero-carbon production of Nickel, Cobalt and Iron and applied for the trademarks NetZero Nickel NetZero Cobalt and NetZero Iron across several jurisdictions.


TSXV:CNC - Post by User

Post by IgnacioCashmereon Apr 04, 2021 7:04pm
274 Views
Post# 32935563

Building the Mine

Building the Mine
How could CNC have the knowledge, skills, ability & capital to build a $250 million CAPEX mine but not an $800-1,000 million CAPEX mine? "It's too big". By what standard? Why are Juniors capable of building $200-300 million CAPEX mines night & day but "need a major" to build something bigger? It is not the money. This isn't your typical 500 million share outstanding $0.45 share price junior. They have all the tools they need to raise as much as needed for CAPEX without a partner, including a major partner. So money isn't the obstacle. They will pay for an engineering study to design the mine & the timetables of construction. So that isn't the obstacle. It appears there will be no objection by First Nations. There is nothing to indicate environmental permits will not be granted in due time. So what is it exactly that makes this project undoable by CNC, requiring a major as partner or a buyout? It might be shoved down our throats with hostile moves to accumulate shares & voting rights, ramming a deal that's good for a few & bad for the rest. But there is no logic behind saying it takes a major to build an open pit mine. That of course will be the major's pitch point, "You need us, you can't do it on your own". Every major started out as a pizz ant somewhere along the line, there is nothing sacred about them or what they do. Ordinarily, Pender street pina colada drinking management would be begging for a buyout or partner, because it is the only way forward. That is definitely not the case here. Yes, a buyout is likely & if it isn't juicy that's just the way it goes, the big holders can vote for a quick buck & be done with it. In risk management, it is just as important to plan for success as failure. In this case, success means build the mine, without a major taking half the pie.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>