Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kontrol Technologies Corp N.KNR

Alternate Symbol(s):  KNRLF

Kontrol Technologies Corp. is a provider of energy management, continuous air quality and emission solutions to commercial and industrial consumers. It delivers building intelligence through the Internet of things (IoT), software and cloud technology as well as project integration. Its smart technology is deployed to customers through a cloud-based interface accessible on desktops and mobile devices. It collects real-time and historical data using IoT sensors and direct connection to industrial control systems, bringing various sources of asset performance data into the cloud where smart-learning software is applied to optimize performance. The Company, through CEM Specialties Inc., offers turn-key emission monitoring equipment, integration design, manufacturing, service, repairs, and on-site performance certification testing. It offers building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning integration, automation and retrofits to enhance the energy efficiency of buildings and facilities.


NEO:KNR - Post by User

Post by yearninyankon Apr 08, 2021 11:41am
122 Views
Post# 32956805

Hypotheticals can be fun.

Hypotheticals can be fun.So a hypothetical ceo builds enthusiasm and confidence with repeated allusions to good things to come. Then hypothetical ceo says "we are undervalued".... Shareholders say "whoopee"...but share price does not react positively as was hypothertically expected. A week later hypothetical ceo says, "here are some new exciting growth numbers".....sell off ensues. Buyback commences. Hypothetical ceo says "why did you guys react that way, never saw that coming, oh well guess we should load up".  Then hypothetical ceo lets the good news come from somewhere else and disclaims any knowledge that it was coming  but then reminds everyone that he had been telling them the entire time good news was indeed coming and that is why he never thought you would react to the hyped news release by selling off. Hypotheticallly speaking that would keep a hypothetical shareholder from selling at this point. I am not alleging this happened here. I am only trying to make sense of what happened here as an observer.

The update yesterday was factual. The whole nature of expectation and emotional reaction is purely speculative. It can easily be argued another way: "Look, these numbers are positive, they reflect our growth, they are not contrary to anyhting we stated as fact before and your expectations are entirely based on forward looking statements that we are not bound to." If the law allows it then it isn't "wrong". And small cap companies trading OTC have to do what they have to do. They have a duty to their shareholders. I may not understand it, or if I understand it I may not like it. But if a hypothetical ceo smartly orchestrates a hypothetical scenario as I described and a hypothetical shareholder sells out of fear I guess I would side with the hypothetical ceo and keep holding. I would just be sure to voice my hypothetical displeasure with that hypothetical situation.


Back to football analogies: trick plays are not really cool usually but when your team is losing and your coach calls one you accept it and say it was smart. Hypothetically speaking of course.

But I would dump that coach and hire one who spent more time developing an offensive line that could score touchdowns without trick plays.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>