RE:RE:RE:So far so good I noticed that too. He listed most of the ones that THTX has also spoken about, but as we know some of those only have one third or so of patients where it overexpresses. Also, he made it seem like it was a first line approach. Maybe we'll get there, but we also know that the more severe the cancer metastices, the more sortilin is expressed so it may not be the case. It's more specialized than what he seemed to be saying in the TV segment.
jfm1330 wrote: Cannot believe they would select a patient without knowing his cancer has overexpression of sortilin. That being said, what Dr. Shah is saying, that it can be used on any solid tumor is scary, because it's not the case. The key of the whole thing is sortilin overexpression. Without that, it will not work as planned.
Wino115 wrote: This is the first time we've heard Prostate Cancer... I'm not sure what level of Sortilin is expressed for that. Or is that what they've put under the more generic "gynecological" cancers? Hope it works, but not the primary kind of tumor we're looking for.