RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:So far so good I believe you and myself together with other existing shareholders make a lot of efforts to understand the prospects of the company as we are already committed, what other choices do we have? the trick is to attract more investors not needing to google scientific information, potential revenues etc day in day out.
Lee430 wrote: I must admit most of the science is above me, however, I do make an effort to read and understand what I can...that said the info does keep me engaged and helps keep me confident in my decision to maintain my embarrassingly overweight position in Thera….Unfortunately if I was relying solely on the minimal updates from Thera to make my decisions I most likely would have at least trimmed my position long ago.
scarlet1967 wrote: The fact that few people understand the science here and elsewhere and most of them are shareholders doesn't justify not trying to explain it to thousands of investors who are NOT shareholders of the company, not yet.
Investors needs to understand the value of their science to be able to validate their decision to start investing in the company. The value of the science is the science itself and the future potential revenues of it.
The company's IR department has to make it easy for people invest their hard earned money in the company, upgraded and timely updated website, frequent flow of information by PRs, webcasts, conferences(retail or institution oriented) by "marketing aces" are must to do things which should be in company's agenda on regular basis failing that we will be stuck with low valuation and volume which will be putting folks off. It's simple only when they start believing in it.