RE:Did anyone seeAssuming that samples have been provided to one or more battery manufacturers for the purpose of making test silicon batteries, those battery manufacturers are now testing those batteries by (I assume) charging them and then placing a load on those batteries thereby depleting them through X cycles. If the HPQ-infused batteries failed or otherwise showed no benefit early in the test then I think we would have heard about it by now as a public company has to release material news whether good or bad. The optimist in me wants to think that the batteries have been put through daily charge/depletion cycles and continue to hold up providing great results and that maybe those results are so good that they are continuing those daily cycles to see how long it takes for them to fail or loose their silicon-infused benefit. If I remember correctly, Bernard mentioned in an interview that there is such a thing as a 100 day test but why not go longer if the battery exceeds expectations at the 100 day mark? You could report the successful completion of the industry-norm 100 day test (if that's a thing) and add test results past that date to sweeten the future news release. I've made a few assumptions in my post but it could explain the delay that we feel but which may not be real. GLTA.