peasoupfog wrote: Don't be too hasty dismissing what he said, and name calling. The point is, we don't know for sure, as the vaccines haven't been around long enough to know for sure what the long term implications are. I'm in my 60s and asthmatic, and am seriously thinking of forgoing the vaccine, not sure yet. But one thing is for sure, if I was under 50, I wouldn't go near it. And especially if I was of child bearing age, male or female. What effect does it have on reproduction and fertility? On developing fetuses? The point is, we don't know. You don't know. The drug makers don't know. Everyone can only surmise. And, as variants spread, drugmakers said they are testing whether a third dose would offer more protection. So 3 doses maybe now? And it's a yearly recommendation as far as I've been reading like the flu shot. Billions if not Trillions of dollars for these companies, with almost no safety studies, or known affects on developing babies, fertility, carcinogenic potential, the list goes on and on. Almost 50% of military personnel have said no. That tells you something.
They need to be pushing the development of other treatment therapies, especially Ivermectin, a drug that's been used for 40 years and is cheap, and proven effective on CV19 in many studies. The fact that they are not tells you they have too much to lose. No need to argue, as the truth is, "you don't know"! Talk to me in 10 years, then we will all know more. The jury is still out.
1ottrunner wrote: You're a moron.
The sooner the population is vaccinated the better. Only an IDIOT that has no understanding of science would make the above statement.