TSX:SRV.UN - Post by User
Comment by
BlueJay2020on Apr 18, 2021 11:07pm
89 Views
Post# 33020140
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The Fund responds...
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The Fund responds...I think that's a tenuous argument which would be very expensive to test in court. A non-compete clause would be a better bet, if there was one.
Fabozzi wrote: The assets are the trademarks which have allowed for the number of standalone restaurants in prime locations to exist. Do we think that a non-Jack Astor's or Scaddabush Sir restaurant could have got the Front/University lease for example? While Royalty doesn't have physical assets they have the asset which has allowed for those physical assets to exist in whole or in part. Now Renegade Chicken is using that infrastructure to generate revenue potentially oustide of the Fund. Obviously this will depend on the language in the contracts between Fund and Sir to a large degree. I no longer have a large enough position to try and do a deep dive on that.