Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gatling Exploration Inc. GATGF

Gatling Exploration is a well-financed Canadian gold exploration company focused on advancing the Larder Project, located in the prolific Abitibi greenstone belt in Northern Ontario. The Larder property hosts three high-grade gold deposits along the Cadillac-Larder Lake Break, 35 km east of Kirkland Lake.


GREY:GATGF - Post by User

Post by BGraham2on Apr 22, 2021 8:36am
159 Views
Post# 33043315

Holes 88, 89, 90, 91

Holes 88, 89, 90, 91In the figure below these four hole are shown.

If i'm interpreting these drill traces correctly , 90 and 91 are  spotted at surface to the south of good holes 88 and 89 and drilled on a steep angle back toward the north , crossing at some point (depth?) the area between good holes 88 and 89. This is not so clear in the previously posted long section views where 90 and 91 appear to be spotted at surface smack in the middle of the good holes.

Possible i suppose that 90 and 91 passed through the area between 88 and 89  at a certain depth ? and missed the lense of mineralization that 88 and 89 successfully hit.

Anyone on here with the technical ability to offer some insight why 88,89, 97 and 111 had long intercepts of open pittable grade and holes around them like 90, 91, 31 etc reported less impressive, shorter intercepts of mineralization?
See figure 2 from the February 16 PR below.

https://www.gatlingexploration.com/_resources/news/nr-20210216-figure2.jpg
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>