RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:TH's website issuesWasn't planning on any written stuff agreed upon with them. This shouldn't be confrontational and I certainly don't want that. Like I said, I will bet my bottom dollar on it they are equally frustrated and agree we are working toward the exact same goal. We just have a view on who we should draft for the team to win the cup.
SPCEO1 wrote: I agree. Let's just let Wino handle this however he thinks best.
palinc2000 wrote: I dont think having them agree to a wrtten summary of the meeting is s good idea ....
Creating a sense of legal liability is not the way to have an open , frank discussion ... on the contrary !
scarlet1967 wrote:
I am not overly optimistic but since you have made the effort I would like to point out few things although you probably know:
1-You are not as good as they you are BETTER.
2-It seems you have already prepared your pitch with few requests, don’t let them bargain it is NOT a negotiation.
3-You can elaborate on your requests but most of the conversation should be about their responses.
4-Stay on topics don’t let them distract you from the purpose of the meeting.
5-If they can’t present solid plans to address the issues schedule another meeting as soon as possible so the company can respond with concrete solutions.
6-Leave the door open for future conversations so the company can interact with the shareholders on an ongoing basis.
5-Ideally everything should be in writing but since this is an informal meeting it would be a good idea if you could draft a summary of the meeting and email it back to the company for their review/approval before reporting back to the investors so there is an element of liability to the whole exercise.
Wino115 wrote: The only person I contacted was Paul. Although, I have noticed a ton of people with familiar names pinged my LinkedIn.
Bucknelly21 wrote:
great who contacted you wino?