Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Post by cskhurasuon Apr 28, 2021 1:22pm
117 Views
Post# 33083440

Responding to a Question Concerning Econ (which I have lost)

Responding to a Question Concerning Econ (which I have lost)Is TC likely to be economic at current gold prices? That's the question to ask.

Let's be clear I have no special knowledge to make this determination...all I have is the data TUD has provided and the amateur's ability to do a back of an envelope calculation. So, recognizing that, let's take a run at it.

Avg grade = 0.7 GPT (I don't think the copper ends up in a salable concentrate so no AUeq)
Recovery = 88%
Gold price = US$1800
Strip Ratio = 5:1
Mining cost = US$2.00 per tonne (ore and waste)

Recovered value of gold per tonne = $36 (0.7 x 0.88 x 1800)/31.1 grams per oz
Less: mining cost of US$12 per tonne (1 tonne of ore + 5 tonnes of waste x $2 per tonne)
Less: US$2.50 per tonne of G&A

That leaves US$21.50 per tonne to cover processing costs, capital and shareholder profit.

Processing costs alone will eat up US$20 per tonne based on my limited undertsanding of metallurgy. There are many examples of refractory gold projects with processing costs well above $20 per tonne and none that I am aware of below $20 per tonne but I could be wrong. Even if you use their estimated processing cost of C$16.50, there is not enough margin to cover capital let alone a reasonable return on investment.

Where would I challenge TUD's numbers? The recoveries of gold at 88% are unusually high. You would need to see hundreds of confirmimg samples rather than just a handful.

The strip ratio is low since it is based on a pit slope of 50 degrees...very steep for such a deep pit. I think KSM is in the low 40s but it is not the same rock, it seems. A higher strip ratio would mean higher costs.

The processing costs look to be too low.

Can TC make it? In my opinion, using their reported numbers and at the current gold price, probably not based on my limited expertise. Better grade would help and is possible. Non-refractory ore would be a big help if it can be found especially at the front end of the project. A higher gold price is clearly needed and I personally am betting on that.

It's early in the process...a deposit like this takes years to clarify. Shareholders need to be patient.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>