RE:RE:RE:No Metal To U.S.?I seem to like following companies that are difficult to analyze and controversial. These have the potential to not only increase in value, but also trap many bears on the wrong side of a move. Pretium was not easy, but at least a person could go through the documents and at least reach one's own mathematical proof that the bear argument was wrong. The bull view was not as positive as the company tried to suggust, but at least one could be certain that an uptrend and positive move on the shares was inevitable.
The controversy on this is many statements of criticism have been made, even presented on TV, that are flat out wrong. The opposition is not following much science, and often times ignoring what is in the reports. It's also a political controversy. More difficult to reach the confidence level of as in the case of a technical controversy, but still a reasonable forecast can be reached.
I'll make another post here titled "NAK Forecast", in a few hours, with my views on scenarios and odds.