RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ecoville..... I did ask you direct questions especially to explain the inconsistencies in your posts but here is a direct question again
"This is a 200 day stock not a 20 day stock" yet you say bought and then traded 20 days later.
Reported sell your shares on February 24th about a month after your first post stating that. Then reported buying 90,000 shares and stating this was not a 20 day hold but a 200 day play and again sold those shares about 20 days later.
Your buying and selling is contrary to your long ACDC statements.
Direct question for you - explain why you say it is a 200 day hold not a day trade or a short hold yet you consistently say you have sold your shares within 20 or so days of buying them. Which is it.
I would suggest that you either post the buy and sells and admit you are not long or tell us you didn't really do this buying and selling as you are really being honest about being long. I suspect you will wiggle around with some doublespeak but never screen shot the truth as that would prove only one of the stories you tell can be true.
It is easy to just name call and call out opposing concepts as stupid or childish or nonsensical. that is a defensive posture of an insecure individual. Just post the facts instead of running off with unsubstantiated info.
perplexedinvest wrote: oh, and you were blocked before as you are one of the group of morons that was absolutley ridiculous to listen to. I should just go back to blocking the group and let the uninformed retail buyers loose out again on a major investment opportunity. I know my portfolio and I am doing fine, not only invested here.