RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:nuttall bought at .18The Eric bashing a year ago was even more hilarious. That other poor frigger, the bow tie guy, stopped getting invited back because every stock he mentioned was a disaster. He just wrote a newsletter and sold his research, and had no skin in the game which made it even easier to dismiss every price target he had. It does make you wonder why eric or any money manager would put themselves out there. I think they actually believe they are being helpful. They don't get a penny for doing it and as a thank you they are subjected to nasty unfounded cheap shots about their ethics. Of course his top picks will be stocks he owns. Why the blazes do you think he bought them in the first place? Because they were his least favoured? And no, I don't expect him or any other manager on BNN to say "you know, .... I really love this stock, I haven't bought any yet, but as soon as I get back to the office I'm going to start buying it huge" . Or "maybe all you viewers can let me know when you are done buying before I buy any". To suggest he would do the opposite is preposterous. Not only would it be unethical, it would be illegal to purposely pump what he's about to sell. Everyone "talks their book" but we all know the difference, including regulators that would put him out of business. And yes he is an active manager that constantly compares valuations not just on an absolute basis, but also on a relative basis. Just buy an index fund if that bothers you. So, scoundrel, or fund manager of the year? I believe he's the latter and is a font of knowledge in a wilderness lacking even a smattering of credible analysts.