Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FormerXBC Inc XEBEQ

Xebec Adsorption Inc designs, engineers, and manufactures products that are used for purification, separation, dehydration, and filtration equipment for gases and compressed air. The company operates in three reportable segments: Systems, Corporate and other, and Support. Its product lines are natural gas dryers for natural gas refueling stations, compressed gas filtration, biogas purification, associated gas, engineering services, and air dryers. The company's geographical segments are United States, Canada, China, Other, Korea, Italy, and France.


GREY:XEBEQ - Post by User

Comment by catchascatchcanon May 01, 2021 7:26pm
193 Views
Post# 33109386

RE:RE:Inmatec

RE:RE:Inmatec

I don't believe they are a high revenue business and I'm pretty confused that many do.  If this was a material deal or contributor to top or bottom line, the deal would have been substantiated by it's own respective PR with details. Again, why would anyone assume that a deal that was mentioned as a 'by the way' at the end of the hydrogen acquisition PR would be note worthy.  It's a small bolt on deal that likely won't contribute meaningfully.  XBC does 5 little of such deals, and they roll from pennies into dollars, but I believe those who think it's going to be a meaningful contributor will be disappointed when next and subsequent quarter hit.  And all due respect, but the length of time they've been in busienss has absolutely stuff all to do with their revenues.  Driving a bus for 30 years does not qualify a person to pilot a space shuttle.  Time in the seat means zero in life and to suggest otherwise is quite amusing.  One man will run a mom and pop shop for a lifetime and another will build a global empire in a decade.  I certainly hope the optimists are correct, but I believe there's about a 4% chance, after much scientific calculation ;)  GLTA





Ciao wrote: Doesn't even pass the sniff test. I hope no one believes that Inmatec that has been around for 25 years only generates $4M in rev annually given their product and area they service.

Look at the acquisition of Titus and AirFlow, how much was paid vs. their annual revenues and what their EBITDA was and I believe you are off by one order of magnitude (factor of 10) and that takes into account that Inmatec is a higher valued business.
 

Newtrader1982 wrote:
I asked Brandon why no revenues for inmatec and was told it wasn't disclosed at request of the seller. Why would inmatec request this? Was told to extrapolate revenues based on multiples previously paid. So based on that they paid a 9x multiple roughly 35 million for inmatec which puts them around 4 million revenue a year. Feel free to offer a rebuttal of this information but those are the numbers I come up with.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>