L&S Not so subtle subtleties On a discussion this past saturday L&S said that everyone was expecting a grade of 2G/T
I thought to myself, anyone who spent half a second looking at any of the drill results over the past 2 years could hardly come to this conclusion. I chopped it up to just another individual who skips any DD.
Then yesterday the topic of low grade mining came up and I posted Kinross' Fort Knox project that uses .3G/T as a cut off. Kinross is not a regular topic of conversation but immediately after posting L&S came up with a quick response.
His response to a specific question was also specific, had a quote and link as well yet his claim that everyone was expecting a grade of 2G/T did not.
This shows that L&S has the ability to do DD and if one has the ability to do DD how could one miss something as large as potential grade when so much data is available?
Posting pattern very much reminds me of morrow. A stream of thoughts never fully completed over many running posts.
Games
of course all in IMHO :)