RE:northstar discovery to the north a) I don't think there has been any syenite intersected within RTM's property so far.
b) I'll be keeping a close eye on the rock types intercepted from the Target D drilling, as it is closest to the large magnetic low.
c) The Catharine Fault seems to join up, as a splay fault, with the Kirkland Larder Cadillac Deformation (LCDZ) Zone. This could make a difference.
d) The Pacaud Fault seems to quit before it reaches the LCDZ, suggesting that the Pacaud Fault is a result of an upward movement of the Round Lake Batholith, possibly making it a concentric, vertical fault.
e) perhaps the eastern magnetic low on Link Catharine is due to an influx of quartz, since a wide (72") band of quartz is not too far away to the east? Or syenite?
f) in the order from low to high, the magnetic intensities are quartz, syenite, diabase, gabbro, basalt, diorite, and andesite.
g) syenite has been mapped towards the NW corner of Catharine Twp, within banded tuff. RTM has some banded tuff on the west side of their block. So maybe Targets B, C and F are within banded tuff, with some possible syenite????
h) according to Map 2043, most of RTM's drilling has taken place within andesite/dacite, while RTM indicates ultramafics/basalt in their assay reports of recent drilling??
i) referring to the Golden Dawn magnetic map, there are several small circular magnetic low anomalies. Could they be syenite? RTM should do a Vertical Gradient compilation of the magnetic total field.
j) is the Link Catharine area like a Kirkland Lake style or a Kerr Addison style mineralized region??
k) another claim block staked in Pacaud Twp, west of the main Link Catharine area.