RE:Shame? I referred to 4 directors, not all. Shame on who ?Shareholders1, for someone who professes to know so much and do unbelievable huge amounts of investigtion and due dilligence, you have revealed yourself to be short on factually correct, non-misleading information.
- You fail to mention that the new director is in blackout;
- Skippen's 451,500 directly held shares cost $2,201,355, an average cost of $4.786. I have no insider information to know that as it's in the AGM material. It looks like you didn't read the AGM material or that you forgot to leave out this important piece of information in your rant on Skippen enjoying the fruits of cheap options;
- Maybe you didn't read the AGM material. You deride the CFO as holding a paltry 1,056 shares. Is it possible that his holding are greater than yours? Could it be that you were unable to vote or ask your questions at the AGM because you do not meet the fundamental, core requirement to attend the meeting - to be a shareholder. Therefore, my belief is that the CFO probably holds more shares than you do. Despite your "stage name", are you in fact a QTRH shareholder?;
- Shorkey, who has been on the BoD for 14 years, is the only Director (other than the newbie) that has not attained the required ownership level. This is a disgrace and is the reason that I voted against Shorkey's nomination for the past 3 years. Others should consider this fact at the next opportunity to vote on QTRH directors;
- You were going to report your perceived "non disclosure" skullduggery to the regulatory authorities. Since you are still harping on it, it appears that your complaint was found to not have merit; and
- Even though you may not be on the BoD, with fudiciary duties, this does not absolve you of of a requirement to not mislead. I don't know what sparked your assertion, but not being on the BoD is not a license to mislead. Come on man!
Hope you have a sunny day.