RE:RE:RE:Comparisons
Cheadle, I totally agree that they need to sell something even if it is below market value. Unfortunately, I am not holding my breath.
Cheadle12 wrote: Best way to do it for fair comparison is to take:
1) Total AFF divide it by EV (not the full picture as we need to look at what was invested back into the company - CapEx & OpEx - including debt servicing). I noted that Crew paid about $2.50 per boe in interest on debt for the quarter.. that's quite a bit given this could be cleared off by an asset sale.
What matters to shareholders:
2) Total CapEx, divide it by EV.
3) Total FCF divide it by EV (and note if there were share buybacks, debt reduction, dividends - return of capital to shareholders).
Cheadle12 wrote: gonat, you know I'm a fan ... but you have to do the same calcs on EV.. not on the just the market cap. This is the full picture..
Crew is like a giant barge, held back by a massive debt anchor. They need to lighten the debt to become somewhere in between a speedboat and a barge.
gonatgasgo wrote: Let's compare Crew with companies that released earnings earlier today and yesterday. I am trying to compare similar figures, as much as I can.
CR: Operating CF of $0.20/share
TOU: Cash flows of $2.11/share
ARX: Funds from operations: $0.77/share
Kelt: Funds from operations: $0.14/share
Now, let's divide the figures above by the share price (yesterday's closing for the 3 and today's close for Crew).
CR: cash flow per share is 17.2% of stock price
TOU: 7.5%
ARX: 9.4%
KEL: 4.8%