Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by LonghandStrongon May 07, 2021 6:51pm
59 Views
Post# 33157946

RE:RE:RE:RE:the pedantic "short and weak"

RE:RE:RE:RE:the pedantic "short and weak"
and you use quotation marks around the words "inferior stock". Are you inferring to the Stockwork, eg. the pyrite hosted gold Breccia or are you referring to the stock, as in company, tud, amk, etc? If so, I'm assuming that you are using the quotation marks properly, as in, you are quoting me? If so, can you find anywhere where I have described in any context this as "inferior stock"? Hint: you won't be able to, have never said it was a bad stock. Now, inferior stockwork, yes, we fundamentally have inferior stockwork, however that is not jusgement, just observation. Versus say brucejack stockwork, ours is inferior, versus most operating mines, ours is inferior. That's not subjectivity and only open to discussion based on what criteria you use to label. In the examples above I use grade. Inferior stock? Well, that's more difficult. Inferior to GT because they attracted a buy out, we have not? Inferior to SEA, because they have a market cap that starts with a B? You see Ford, it's all based on your own unique perspective. Now I know this all went over your head, so I will respond for you..."he's a basher, bodily function, illegal scum" etc.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>