RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Building expectationsIt will be interesting to see the votes. Maybe if someone is really far off the others, it will be enough of a signal to Dawn on replacing that person with the capital markets oriented person she, Paul and we desire. They really don't need a large Board, just a capable one. She should ask for a resignation for low vote tally members later when they find the replacements they and we want. Can't waste the precious resources on a large Board. Would be a good question to lob in to the annual. ---given Mr/Ms. XXXX had a much lower vote tally, if you expand the Board would you ask Mr/Ms XXXX to resigne in order to keep it manageable and within budget?
ANALIAS00 wrote: What they said to Wino about the perfect board they have in place, I would say he and any other CEO would have answered the exact samething. He had no choice to answer what he answered. It was 100% expected. There could be a complete known moron on the board he would have answered the same thing. Not voting against at least one member was a mistake from us. It could have served Levesque and make his life easier about gettingbthe best of the best board if you want my opinion.
Bucknelly21 wrote: Next time they won't be so fortunate...