RE:PYR and HPQIn my opinion, too much is made of the business relationship between PYR and HPQ on this board. Some posters speak blatently about PYR on this board as if it has a direct effect upon HPQ. Sometimes you have to re-think what board you have clicked on when you read certain posts as you may think you have clicked on the PYR board instead of the HPQ board. The two corporate entities have a business relationship and PYR holds a percentage of the ownership of PYR but not a controlling one. The directors and officers of each corporate entity are distict and separate with no common individuals therefore there are no common interests at the directing mind level. This is fact but, again, on this HPQ discussion board you may be led to believe otherwise. In summary the two corporate entities have distinct and separate interests driven by distinct and separate directing minds yet the two entities have somewhat common, interdependant goals which align on the techological side of the development of nano particles. Do your own DD but be aware of a certain slant to posts listed here.