Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Providence Gold Mines Inc V.PHD

Alternate Symbol(s):  PRRVF

Providence Gold Mines Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is engaged in the process of exploring and evaluating its mineral property located in California, United States. It owns 100% interest in Tuolumne Property. The Company’s gold mines consist of seven patented stake mineral claims and 22 located claims, encompassing an area of approximately 324 acres, which includes Bonita, Consuelo, FairPlay, Good Enough, McCarthy, Mexican, and Providence. The Providence Group of Mines is located in the Summerville Mining District, Tuolumne County, California, upon the eastern belt of the Mother Lode District. Its subsidiary is Providence Gold Mines (US) Inc.


TSXV:PHD - Post by User

Comment by givemeabreak1on May 13, 2021 11:25pm
71 Views
Post# 33201353

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:My estimates - ie "MY "speculation" about PDH gold on ground

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:My estimates - ie "MY "speculation" about PDH gold on groundGamble 
I think I am starting to understand you!  That is a scary though eh!  So English is your second language right!

You said (4 samples >10g/t; 11 samples over 5g/t; 23 samples >3g/t)

Is what you were tying to say there were 23 samples >3g/t which incuded 11 over 5g/t and 4 over 10 g/t?  If not 4 plus 11 plus 23 is 38 last time I checked!  
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>