RE:RE:RE:RE:Scorecard666999 wrote: its FOMO...its high risk stock, it can go up, but it can also go down a lot, its nonsense to compare SIC to LAB, I like to use chart and I can see nice breakout for SIC lately, now its waiting time investors are waiting for drill results, if you think that SIC is undervalued buy more, its simple as that, and please dont compare other companies with SIC, as its clear that share price is not related to other neighbours, it has its own story Cheers
666999, I disagree.
I think it would be a mistake not to compare the various junior gold exploration-only companies operating in the same political jurisdiction (and in fact, the same territory) before making a decision re. investing in one (or more, or none) of them.
1) They are all at the exploration stage of the process.
2) Their claims are located in Central Newfoundland.
3) They are all looking for the same metal (gold).
Are you really saying you didn't even consider doing some research into any of the other players in the area?
Even if you conclude that SIC is a good value or opportunity or has great upside potential, ignoring aternatives before making a decision is not the best way to go about it in my view......
I am a NFG fan, but that doesn't mean I ignore what's going on with other companies who are also looking for gold in Newfoundland, and I am open to changing my mind on other players as events unfold.
Having said that, to each his own......not telling you how to invest your money, just giving my perspective.......each person has their own investment style / criteria, and they should stick to that with which they are most comfortable.......just providing my point of view......