RE:RE:RE:RE:Great Q1 results, but what trickles down to shareholders ?So it is sufficient to announce an expected blow out Q1 on March 8 via conference call comment? Does that constitute "general disclosure" ?
Is it also OK to issue 690k options on March 15, presumably at then market price, realizing of course that anyone else hoping to buy 690k shares would need to bid up the share price and pay much more?
And the 420k options is generous (as admitted) , but that is ok because the CEO already owns 40% ? What logic is that? - It is ok to dilute shareholders (taking future value away from shareholders) because the person benefitting from the dilution owns 40%?!