misleadingI hate when companies mislead...by expanding the width of an intesection
don't get me wrong 113 g over a meter is decent especially if its true width and not just core length and if the analysis is repeatable
It is however grossly misleading to publish the headline as "22.67 meters of 5.17 grams"
The math behind this figure is:
1 meter of 113 g
22 meters of 0.4 grams .... less than half a gram !!!!