RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Share price taken downStockingUp21 wrote: I think everyone agree need for nasdaq.
but not option now. Market cap lower than IPO, dilute shareholder over and over. Reverse split for nasdaq, then dilute by 30% and no longer qualify.
LosAngelesDave wrote: Webster defines backwater exchange - see TSX. You have 2 biotechs over 1b cap, Tril and Aup. Hence the backwater designation. Synonym - see janky, minor, wannabe, #wanttobeusa
Perhaps expand your intelligence, or at least make an effort to understand what exactly is going on. The same, uninformed rhetoric. " Dilution, dilution, dilution".
This is a junior Canadian Biotech company. From zero to phase lll.
Do you really not understand the necessity of those equity raises?
Instead of continuing to repeat the same, useless commentary, why not provide an idea, or suggestion as to how you think they should have proceeded, how exactly do you expect that they should have gotten to this point? Were you going to lend them the money?
It's a very simple question that I have yet to hear a reasonable answer to.
What was the alterntive to the equity raises? keeping in mind they needed the money.
What do you suggest they should have done instead?
This is another example of what I stated in my previous post.
One track, uneducated minds, focused solely on the stock price, without accounting for the necessary processes for the company to achieve it's goal.