RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Great Q1 results, but what trickles down to shareholders ?If annual options of 1.5%, for all particpants, is say the norm/ is acceptable, I am saying that if you factor in what the CEO already owns he alone effectively gets 1.6%. That is too much.
Another way to look at it: If CEO owned 90% of the corp and the public 10%, and there was a 1% option plan, the public would get diluted 10% each year.
Not sure what you mean by negative dilution. That would require management to give up shares.
On moving on to another name/ driller - this is sometimes voiced by various managements in answering unhappy shareholders. I consider it a warning sign of management.s sense of entitlement. Such an attitude, especially if followed, leads to worse board and mangement practices, not better.
If I do not like what the governing party is CDA or USA is doing, as a citizen, should I just move to another country? Yes according to some in GOP - suggesting certain democratic congresswomen move back to where they came from. Arrogant and distasteful to say the least.. People can fall into a trap of thinking this way.
Same applies to stock (company) ownership. Ownership.