RE:RE:RE:RE:Anybody sensing any anger here?I think everyone here pretty well knows what others are thinking. All relevant, and diverse opinions are quite natural. I haven't emailed the CEO very often, but I've found he is quite responsive to such communications. It's possible that some here have already emailed, but those who haven't might give it a try. You might be pleasantly surprised. And, please, do contribute to this bulletin board regularly. Unfortunately, much of the commentary is repetitive, but that just par for the course when people are frustrated.
noremac50 wrote: Over 5% of quinsam is on this board.
They want to believe Roger is playing everything perfectly.
If he was. Everything would be going pretty well and future value would be rising.
Investors just want to hear a little more about how great things are going. In a data driven world, it's really not surprising that shareholders want more data. Even updating the website would be appreciated and very cheap.
I don't think people are on here, trying to tell Quinsam or Roger what they should be doing.
Shareholders are voicing their opinions, ideas and concepts regarding the company, sector, future, etc.
Shareholders also find it odd that some posters keep trying to push a narative, a story.
Talk is cheap, we don't need to be walked in to what to think. It's a very deceitful tactic.
The Harvard connection is even more suspicious.