RE:Plain old drill results goollldddd wrote:
I feel like I haven't seen drill results from Crawford In ages. Less than 100 holes going into a base metal PEA with nickel sulphides in Archean systems which need to be constrained to high grade veins um.... Montcalm.and NICO/Alexo-Dundonald over400+ holes. The historic way proven..Both historic mines in Timmins, 1-2 % nickel for cut off. so many press releases about mills and land acquisition and geophysics geophysics geophysics but nothing about just plain old drill results . The background noise of nickel in Timmins is 0.15-0.2%. so is all of Timmins pratically mineable to Canadian Nickel standards. Alsoo MAPS. Didn't they hire ORIX to make maps 3 months ago after someone complained. I seen same geophysical maps being used since March 2020. Where are the MAPS. Can we cross sections with block model .
We have to take CNC for what it's worth. It's a large scale lower grade but it looks like the highest of the lower grades and a lower cost mine. I think most expect the usual drill results from here on in. The way they will see price appreciation is 1.They prove it actually is a large scale, 2. They can prove they are a low cost mine and 3. The price of nickel increases. Who knows if we see any other surprises to the upside. Possibly higher grade nickel, joint ventures etc. As long as Mark Selby continues to proceed quickly, we'll all get the answers to our questions very soon.