RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:My Feb 7, 2021 Post. No replies to it. Why not?mrmoribund - thanks. I may reply further, but for now will just say:
- Yes, past is past, but past behaviour can be predictive of future behaviour, especially if 3 or 4 of the same BoD members are involved. Example look at the $ SIZE of total board fees each of the last 3 to 4 years. and be sure to note that they had been in $US until recently.
- Changing the government/ prime minister/ president is not revolution, expecially if there has been LT failure to deliver. The strategic plan since 2006 was not created by the shareholders, it was created by the BoD. They are accountable.
- Based on LT price chart, about 200m increase in deficit since 2007, shareholders should be deeply concerned about who came up with the new plan and will excute it/ spend 100m to 300m or more. - the BoD. How many of the BoD have jumped into QTRH shares with both feet? One foot?
Personally, I am not prepared to trust their judgement any longer.
- Fattouche - There may be some comfort in having him there, but note that he is just a 2% holder, and that small % is not necessarily deserving of a board seat. He needs to add value too. Has he added value? I also think I was wrong earlier - if Fattouch is included, there are 4 BoD members dating back to 2006/7. Would a prime miniter last that long? Shareholders have not been paying attention or are divided. If there were a large institutional investor, there would be major change at the BoD.