Palisades Ventures Inc USTDF

RE:well sme of the drill results are in

[Farmer9]

A long wait for a poorly written news release.

gemsearcher2 wrote: and they suck as expected..but the way they wrote up that convoluted NR kinda reveals a whole host of clarity issues i would say... like it could hardly be written in such a way as to be more difficult to comprehend than it is... unreal
How on earth could they have spent 3 months to do in house sample inspections and still not even been thru them enough to decide which ones need to go to a lab? ..Add to that it appears that of the samples they sent in for assay they never checked for gold and now that needs to be done to selected samples? what on earth are they talking about?
Some of these guys may have their names attached to some renowned form of past greatness but that lustre is long gone imo.
Too bad.. but more easty to understand why BM is gone.
WRT the Alkali hole it seems to me that the "siliceous and carbonaceous Vinini mudstones and cherts" that run from 635' to td at 1320' shouldn't need much inspection to see there is no gold there... so what are they still sending in for analysis? i mean one sample from 636' would give them all they need to know the rest of the way to bottom! lol
i mean i am no geologist but this nr is rediculous.jmo!