RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Re: Order updates provides valuable info:)No doubt about that Flamingo. I know what you mean too. Some of those legacy contracts, or some of the other newer contracts that they got we're just very expensively risky. But the backlog is what kepy them from going BK. That's now hopefully in the past for us. I just can't see them screwing up like they did with those legacy contracts. I'm hoping that Business jet backlog is closer to 5 years than 2 though. I just think we need the runway there. Enjoy your weekend.
flamingogold wrote: BT was far from "stable" but I know what you meant. Never let the well run dry, but also make sure the cost to fill the well is cheaper than it is to pull the water out.
BBDB859 wrote: Good point buddy.
Without backlog we don't have anything to sell. That's why BT was so stable. Thanks Pablo.
Now lets see some sales to grow it. I think that once the 7500's 99.7% reliability is tested and passes the test from owners, we may see increased purchases.
PabloLafortune wrote: The root of the matter for Bombardiers's share price long term is the $$$ backlog. All the rest - production cadence, ebitda, refinancing, equity raise, buyback, etc - is either in place, will be or is possible and doable.