RE:Should ARC receive a TOU evaluation just based on ASSETSYou're not likely to generate much 'Pizazz' in the Canadian energy space. Let's leave that to Tesla. This company is doing all the right things and the general market trajectory based on real-world fundamentals is with us for the foreseeable future.
Kind of getting tired of your comparisons to TOU. This isn't TOU and there are a lot of investors who see value in this business without the need for dog and pony shows and other marketing tricks. And this is coming from a career PR professional (me).
The ink is hardly dry on the merger... Patience, poeple! Cheers and GLTA ARX longs.
--
A plan to pay down 2% debt is not very exciting for a home owner, and should be even less exciting for a 10Billion dollars enterprise company.
ARC a company with almost 9 Billion in enterprise value, is concerned about paying down 2% debt.
It goes a long way for share holders doesn't it? Not in my opinion.
Last quater paying off 300 million in debt, did that immediately increase the share value 42 cents a share, i don't think so.
ARC's leadership lacks Pizazz, resulting in a lack of ability to get market interest in the stock.
I think the finance group if they really want to be compared to TOU, make their quaterly reports looks the same, i don't like ARC reports, and the tourmaline reporting structure works for me TOU are significantly more respected than ARC, and ARC report looks like it written for accountants not investors that are looking at ARC peers, like tourmaline.