Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fabled Silver Gold Corp. V.FMK.P


Primary Symbol: V.FCO

Fabled Silver Gold Corp is focused on acquiring, exploring and operating properties that yield near-term metal production. The company focuses on acquiring precious metal properties in Mexico with blue-sky exploration potential. It has entered into an agreement with Golden Minerals Company to acquire the Santa Maria Property, a high-grade silver-gold property situated in the center of the Mexican epithermal silver-gold belt. The belt has been recognized as a metallogenic province, which has reportedly produced more silver than any other equivalent area in the world.


TSXV:FCO - Post by User

Comment by BearBull007on May 22, 2021 3:03pm
114 Views
Post# 33254347

RE:Unlocking copper value

RE:Unlocking copper value
CafeCuban wrote: In the recent WSR interview Peter H indicates ( watch from 24:30 onwards) there is already 200 million+ pounds of copper in the Muskwa property, potentially more to come. With copper at $4.6 per pound, the gross value is ~1 billion dollars. Am I understanding this correctly? If this is the case, why is it not priced in FCO sp today? Link to interview here... https://youtu.be/XfGZ16wdT-Y


https://www.sedar.com/GetFile.do?lang=EN&docClass=24&issuerNo=00036883&issuerType=03&projectNo=02952926&docId=4575605
PG. 7:
While the estimates presented for the Davis-Keays (MacDonald 1970) and Churchill (Carr 1972) deposits are considered relevant, they are historical, do not meet NI 43-101 standards or use current CIM terminology, and therefore are not reliable and should not be relied upon. The writer has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, nor is Fabled treating the historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>