RE:RE:Future Heywood_Silvers wrote:
The future lies in Beskauga, which is why I understand why the company wanted to change the name.
Since you think the future would be the Beskauga project, how could its value be assessed especially on the basis of the latest 43-101 (res. Ind. Of 2.3 million ounces of gold, 476,100 tonnes of copper and 7.25 million ounces of silver)?
Shouldn't we first remember that the acquisition price would be 62M maximum for a NPV of 1170M on the basis of the 2018 presentation. This ratio of only 5% makes me doubt the NPV, all the more that 100 million tonnes are already lost between the 2018 presentation and the 43-101 of last February. Didn't the seller overestimate the value of the project?