RE:RE:jv fundingTradeTracer wrote: Unfortunately 650 million shares is diluted enough, long term less dilution is key Deals made are water under the bridge, can only prove the tech and learn going forward with future deals
I don't disagree, what is done is done, and am glad they have cancelled future deals. I keep hearing dilution though, you dont think reducing cash/ebitda by 50% has a negative impact to shareholders? Have you done a simple spreadsheet to show net cost of EACH to shareholders? Not sure why we needed 9 JV. Anyway, just food for thought, it would be refreshing if someone would admit this may not have been the best deal. Too often I see shareholders put management on a pedestal as if they walk on water and do no wrong. imho we can influence change, if we are organized we can have a voice going forward.