RE:666999 ;1rockit wrote: Uour talking about market cap . Take a look at LAB . They've got a really decent land position around SIC , BUT I believe its overvalued on its goods . They released results last week and I was actually thinking about shorting the stock. There results were terrible yet the stock is still rising. Yet Sokoman has released results that I think were very good , not stellar like NFG but they are very good . In fact Sokoman is the only company ghus far that actually has the goods . I think its being held back because they really don't have a big land position. I think they rectified that situation yesterday by goi6 in 50/50 with Benton Resources. It's all up to the eye of the buyer. Cheers .Happy hunting. You might want to take a look at King , Sky , Benton Resources, Labrador Resources , and a couple others . I think personally that they will all do well if NFG and SIC keep hitting great drilling numbers.
Junior mining is about finding gold deposits not just accumulating land positions. SICs Moosehead property is more than large enough with 8km strike. This is also a story about depth like NFG will be. Did you read and understand my earlier post on NFG and the Keats zone? NFG is drilling in a relatively small area. SIC has the goods on Moosehead. If they had not completed a single hole I would completely agree with you on the absolute need for land size. SIC added the Fleur property and now JV with Benton since they are tripling down on great opportunities in front of them. Not for the reason you believe. IMHO. SIC has had about 5 to 6 great PRs of drill results going back to last November. Most of them are stellar. Should not be compared to NFG which is valued 20 times more?? BC