RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:shareholder return too weakI messaged you directly before you posted your last comment. I will not spam the board. The company is easily identified from info given; there are only two senior Canadian midstreamers, and one of them failed last year's dividend guidance.
Feel free to post the company name here and describe how it deserves the "unicorn" label. It's not a characterization I have encountered before regarding this company, but I'm open to considering a well-thought-out case for it.
Note that my focus is dividend growth, not simply yield.
.
schocor wrote: Well, you have found yuorself to thew board of a high yeilding stock and claimed that Gibson's yeild/growth is not high enough for you to invest. I believe I can speak for the board and state caterogically that "Interest in these unrelated - unicorn - stocks is high and their names provide more than topical value". Please throw out a name of a company that meets your standards; I am sure it will garner the interest you require amongst those that currently invest in Gibson.