RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:MaxmoeWell, I hope they learned a lesson. That was a bad idea to cut and paste the identical response just changing names. Dumb. I can live with dumb bad ideas. I have them far too often. Way better than the allegedly sneaky greasy stuff the short report referenced.
Freedom1966 wrote: Lionel Many investors are emailing us this week with respect to our response to the short report, among a few other items. In the interest of time, I’m going to give a reply here on CEO to address the individual requests.
In terms of our response to the recent short report, our advisors had suggested we NOT give any long, or direct replies, and focus on our business at hand (as you can imagine it’s a VERY busy time for us here at Cielo). Upon reviewing a response to the same “market researcher”, with a very similar experience, we thought their response was well thought out, professionally written by a CEO who was under the same attack from the same company. It was simple and succinct and so we chose to echo their words and carry on with the task at hand.
From our understanding, these websites attack public companies that are on the rise, to cause instability in the market for their gain. If you have reviewed their site you have likely already come to the same conclusion.
All news announcements of any material nature must be released as a PR. I hope you can appreciate we cannot comment to individual investors that may give someone an advantage over another shareholder. We will continue to push PR’s out with each material item as we can.