RE:RE:weeeeee-landerEdcando, so, you know for a fact that the difference between a rough average of 100 units monthly projected demand and the 20,000 production capacity is mostly due to component shortage? Otherwise they would have sold some thousands of units, understanding that we should all recognnize that it is prident to have some contingency excess capacity? Any authoritative source for this or purely your own conjecture? I know that they eventually referred to component challenges, that apparentky OES has been tasked for getting these and that things have "stabilized", but I don't know what that means. This is from an update newsrelease and maybe a tweet. But you are telling us that, as expected in the media, when the chip supply normalizes later this calendar year, KNR sales will ramp up to some thousands of units per month? Is that correct? Otherwise, would you agree that one does not pursue a capacity of 20,000 units expecting to sell a few hundred or a few thousand? Or if one did, by mentioning 20,000 one is taking a real risk of sending a message that can be materially misinterpreted unless there is some very cleae description around it...a little bit more than production capacity is not a sales projection when the difference at the time could be 10k, 15k.....19K, 19.5K (what is the value then anyhow.) Does this sound reasonable, or not? And yes, running a publicly traded company has responsibilities including providing reasonable disclosure so that people can make an informed decision....and difference in hindreds of millions of dollars per month can be seen as quite substantial. Yes, there could have been a basis for complaining about a $5 share price which clearly sounds absurd given the current price of $1.50 that not one individual thought remotely possible a few short months ago. What is completely off base here...besides potentially misinterpreting the crux of the argument that you are making? Lets be honest and fair.