RE:RE:RE:Who trades 1 share?Funny how I remember your handlename as a basher. In 2020, before PYR breaks out, you were bashing the company. So let me doubt about your assumption of realised profit from 0.35 to 6$.... You probably missed the run. Uncle was certainly helpfull if you had listened to him back in 2019. But @12$, I can understand the pain. All longs had been through this, from 0.90$ in 2017 to 0.20$ in 2020... Down 75%. Yes, we've been there !
gojotv! wrote: Yeah, not desperate at all...
If anything, re-posting of old news month after month to massage the share price is what strikes me as desperate.
And I think it's pretty significant that investors who post actual facts get attacked and called "bashers" when outright, repeatedly proven liars like UncleWrong, who appeal to everyone's magical thinking are supported and showered with "likes".
That's what makes this a pumped stock.
I kept about 2000 shares for my RRSP, because I'm not collecting on that for a decade, but the rest, which I bought at $0.37, and which magically blew up to twenty times its price on but speculation and a few multiples of increased revenue...
Yeah...
Banked the profits happily.
And I'm even happier to wait this one out.
I know crazy when I see it. and I don't buy crazy... only provable revenues.
GLTA! ScienceFirst wrote: Gojotv ... You sound desperate with your weak arguments. Trying hard, just like FUDFUD12 and some other shorts that come and go. Are you taking the relay? Are they exhausted, burned out (or should I say torched out)? Unless that's because they left their shirts? Or shorts? Or both!
Strange though that you don't talk about both shorts manipulations pattern in March. The one that pumped it up to 12$ on no real news in order to then intentionally started shorting it to create a FUD and then allow Mariner to step in around 8$ to then intentionally drop its 0.74$/share "
recommandation" to finish the job and drive it down 4.82$. But this time is over now.
This time, the wind has turned and our technology has received grants from the highest instances at the scientific levels of both levels of governments (PRIMA and NSERC).
I feel for you. You really sound desperate. But keep trying. Intelligent shorts (if that's possible), would capitulate.
Read these:
“
Sustainable Development Technology Canada is incredibly proud to support PyroGenesis’ innovative plasma technology which helps reduce harmful toxins from entering our environment. By investing in companies, like PyroGenesis we can bring lasting economic, environmental and health benefits to Canadians and the world” said Leah Lawrence, President and CEO of Sustainable Development Technology Canada.
HPQ SILICON: A PROJECT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SILICON-BASED ANODE MATERIALS FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES HPQ-Press-Release_ENG_FINAL_VERS_CL5.pdf (hpqsilicon.com) With a budget of $500,000, the project is jointly funded by the Ministre de l'conomie et de l'Innovation via PRIMA Qubec (40%), the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (40%), HPQ Silicon Resources Inc. (10%) and PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (10%)