RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hows Everyone doing ?
monster you left out all the caveats. I expect better and more from you. So disappointed? Had i not said that the share value would hit $2.50 plus depending on what contracts are signed huh??? I said with what the company had then it could reach $2 plus but i had qualified on contracts. The one mistake i made was buying and still buying into what was sold after 2 yrs of nothing that should be max point and saying that $2 was still a great buy in price as time went with nothing the price collapsed. I did maintain $10 plus as high as $70 but i gave reasons on calculations for contracts on things like the hubble and the revenues on 10 and 20 percent of the costs. Many of these telescopes are in the $200 million to $500 million range 10 percent is 20 to 50 million 20 percent 40 100 million based on shares and a faulty 25 times revenue which should not be applied unless companies are overall net profit should not have been used but assuming one contract 50 million with then we will say 100 million shares i dont know .50 and going by the company being net overall profitable 25 times $12.50 a share but i calculated on 5 such telescopes 250 million 2.5 at 25 times gets those 50 to 70....does this ring a bell how i talked so i would like people to tell the full facts not some conflated bs that is not it. So time frame was called based on revenue and calculations not ever otherwise. People can blame me only so far but not to a degree beyond that i did stress there needs to be contracts and depending contingent on that the share value can be. Now if i followed my own perspective i would have dumped at the $3.76 share value it clearly had no business at instead a lot at these levels which i will say it has no business at and this will be proven this year...remember i gave caveats again $5 plus will need one golden contract of any of the three companies and another 2 to 3 other sizable and decent contracts no less than 3 to 4 add another 5 to get to $5 plus now if i am not mistaken i said this very thing in a response i made to Damn. That said if the golden conteacts are extremely big maybe in that light 1 or fewer than 5. But i did caveat in the past i caveat in the present and will in the future but i use where companies indicate possibilities but if 0 contract well you got your answer i will not say more than 2 max on potential but i will further qualify it as i had if not in 2 yrs the shares will get hammered that is if i have not succeded in my desire to stop posting. But can you guys not tell the whole facts especially after i have only repeated it so many times recently mostly when answering to damn. I know what i said even so yeah i get upset when people distort and donot give the full context. As to when i said this year and still strongly hold to it...i said $5 to $10....Pristine Snapdragon and Orin contracts the driving force you have 2 out of 3 Golden. Orin to come out next year follow Nio China and Nvidia to see where things are at. Anyways the caveat here is that i am 100 percent right on my read as to what i have said about being partnered for almost a year...it happens 95 to 99.5 percent as far as my perspective we are golden but i am giving .005 percent to .05 percent i can be wrong...anyways setting things straight