RE:RE:Powerful Final Submission to CAFC The summary is the start of each section.
The gist of the argument is that WiLan's were appropriately shared with the jury. That Apples lawyers didn't cross examine properly... and then raised arguments that weren't shared to the jury after the trial.
Given the CAFC only looks not at the conclusion but if the jury heard evidence that led to a verdict... the original verdict should stand.
Is a very convincing argument and they highlight many cases that support the position, including VirnetX.
At these prices, this is a free roll. I'll take it. Unbelievable that the market values this as a complete loss at the CAFC. Ridiculous. Opportunity of a lifetime.