RE:RE:RE:RE:A Different PerspectiveIf I may Rookie, and please feel free to look at my past posts, I am a believer of course, but I hope always open minded. With respect, your assessment on the market potential and or what BQE already has in the bag looks short sighted to my mind and in essence why the stock is not higher. Others have explained past promises and failures, the excitement in the market for a new story was killed, with over promising and massive under delivering by previous leadership.
David/Peter and their team have done exactly what they said they would do, concentrated on their core expertise in mining, brought about an answer to a real problem that exists, the two you mention being the two of relevance Selenium contamination and SART for Cyanide recovery. Each alone valuable, but these are not the only strings to BQE bow, they can also do what others do and - for me this is important, they are also looking ahead and in their own R&D department, looking at what is the next biggest issue regulators will be regulating. So often companies invent “things” that answer a problem that doesn't need answering, BQE are actually anticipating regulations, not speculation.
BQE Waters biggest problem is not getting value for their blue sky, the potential just in the two processes you mention are massive, think ash ponds in power generation which they have just entered, clean up over the next decade is a must,. That is forgetting everything else Sulphate (already Patented ) etc and other IP they own. Why dont we get value for blue sky on all these process, especially one as disruptive to the industry as Selen-IX and I use disruptive in the correct sense? its because of short sightedness you verbalize here.
As a shareholder, I have to wonder why any other shareholder would be so disparaging of a company doing everything right, unless their objectives are different to mine