RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Warrents up over 3%, New HighB will be left with $190,300 not $110,000 if convert.
So in your example, B could decide to convert. So B will now have 55,000 commons worth $5, but will need to pay $6.54/share, correct? So 55,000x$5 - 55,000x($6.54-$5) = 190,300
My thinking maybe wrong, but what I'm saying is, if you have the ability to convert the warrents to commons, then wouldn't your risk be limited to the risk to the commons??
My thinking could be way off.... please correct me.
All just my opinion/view/thinking/trying to understand.
Husky4000 wrote: Let's take an example. Scenario A and scenario B
A. holder of 25000 shares and 5000 warrants.
B. holder of 55000 warrants
If share price goes to 5$...
Warrants would be 'out of the money', so they would trade at maybe 2$ (my guess). And that would be useless to convert them since they would be under 6.54
So, A would be left with (5x25000) and (5000x2) 135K
B would be left with 110K. B is the loser. And even more if the sp keeps dropping
That's extreme but not impossible. who knows what can happen in this world. I'm 95% sure the warrants will be more profitable, but I keep in mind the 5%