GREY:NMKEF - Post by User
Comment by
mick1888on Jun 04, 2021 7:41pm
426 Views
Post# 33334956
RE:Pourquoi Nemaska a Bécancour : Pierre Fitzgibbon le 2
RE:Pourquoi Nemaska a Bécancour : Pierre Fitzgibbon le 2So why was it that IQ INVESTED OVER £80M in Nemaska 1.0? Why did the Minister back the project all the way until forced (manipulated) into ccaa? And why did IQ team up with a tax haven bidder when they should have been independent, willing and ready to team up with whoever won the bid on a level playing field?
Don't tell me IQ and that Minister did not influence the bidding process, which resulted in scaring of other potential bids that could have included the 25k existing shareholders.
dalesio_98 wrote: Pourquoi Nemaska a Becancour : Pierre Fitzgibbon le 2 juin 2021 6h46 audio 11 minutes -- Nemaska : une decision economique, defend Pierre Fitzgibbon -- Le ministre de l'Economie et de l'Innovation du Quebec, Pierre Fitzgibbon, affirme que la decision d'implanter Nemaska Lithium a Becancour au lieu de Shawinigan n'est pas une decision politique, mais bien financiere. En entrevue a Toujours le matin, le ministre va encore plus loin en precisant que le site de Shawinigan n'etait tout simplement pas approprie aux besoins d'implantation et d'expansion potentielle de l'usine. --
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/ohdio/premiere/emissions/toujours-le-matin/episodes/537209/rattrapage-du-mercredi-2-juin-2021/6