Popeye82 wrote: urai58 wrote: Hello Popey82,
Very good that you raise this issue. I can understand your annoyance very well. It is about contributions at w:o.
In the meantime a lot of time has passed. I had asked @gast77 at w:o months ago to mediate between @winni2 and me. After some time I had then settled the difference between @winni2 and me by board mail directly.
My contributions at that time were based on wrong interpretations on my part. In the meantime @winni2 and I fight together for example in the thread Max Resource at w:o for an objectified evaluation of the investment case. By boardmail I am in intensive contact with @winni2.
I would be happy if you accept my apology.
Good luck to you furthermore.
urai58
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Hello Urai58(guess this is your Birth Day, but not sure),
Just 3 Adds:
1 As said, All good again.
And like it, really prefer it that Way.
What I have experienced, if you go with People in 1:1, Contacts/Talk,
you can actually very often talk "very reasonable" with the People.
Solve Any, Existing, Problems, with Each Other, and All that.
Find out that you often "actually have Any, a lot of Common Grounds(Gemeinsame Grundlagen)", which before did not looked that Way.
But that also needs the
WILL, to "get along, with Each Other"...........
What in the "heatened" Stock Boards most often "just not" work.
This is not the Only, but One of the
MAIN Reasons why I "inzwischen" prefer having Any "Good 1:1 Contacts, Relationsships",
than "going to the Stock Board Masses".
With the "Masses", you can see the virtual Stock Boards got more and more a "kind of War Zone", I think.
If you want see it that Way, a Kind of "
ugly UNLIMITED", i
Mo.
(MXR Board is a for that)
2 Winni2 and Gast77 are, in my Opinion, 2 "very, very Good Guys".
Can absolutely recommend to "work together" with them.
This is
VERY,
VEEEEERY productive, to my Experience -
IF you use it the "Right" Way.
(to be honest: in Our Community we often know a lot, lot more than the Guys in the "Public" Boards(which "fights" Each Other))
I also do it Myself.
That does not mean that They are "always right" with their Opinions, Analysises etc, you have "always to agree" with Them.
No.
But these are 2 Guys(Girls), Users, which really Eine "Menge, Menge draufhaben", to my Judgement.
And these 2 also take Money into their
HANDS.
Not "only" talking, like much Other in the German Boards.............
3 Bist Du auch an DSM dran
?? Not sure, but I mean to remember.
One Further I hold Pieces(grabbed @0.15 CaD).
As
IF so, I would like to get that "River Issue" straight, "may finally" get it "geklrt".
(the Agreement
needed, with
4 Countries encompassing, if you remember)
As it is, to my Impression, so far, One of the Few "Maker
OR Breaker" Issues, Existing, of Them.
P.S.
With DSM, One of their Further Main Issues, to my Judgement, is,
that they have
STILL a
LOT,
LOT of Further Discovery/Drill Potentials left.
Don't remember exactly out of the Moment,
but if you look in their Presentation,, or Website:
The(ir) outlined Resource is based on
ONE Lense,
but they have
still FIVE(5), or "around that, something in that Direction", to test, as I remember....................